Tuesday, 21 February 2017

Articles 


Irom Sharmila and the Catch-22 paradox

By Pradip Phanjoubam

The last two weeks or so in Manipur must rank as one of those in which events overtake the capacity of a society to absorb and understand them. Just to name a few, there was the high drama over the release and the re-arrest of Irom Sharmila, the dismissal of the RIMS director, Dr. S. Sekharjit and now the unfolding tragedy of police firing in Ukhrul which resulted in two dead and several injured, according to so far sketchy reports which have begun pouring into newsrooms in Imphal. Though none of them must go without a commentary, space limitation would restrict this column to focus on Sharmila which is today emerging as one of those curiously paradoxical and irresolvable cases. Moreover, the RIMS case and Ukhrul firing are too recent and explosively unfinished to be with any fairness encapsulated within the length of a newspaper article. In the RIMS case, there is still a legal question as well, therefore the likelihood of a commentary amounting to the offence of “subjudice”, by undermining and attempting to influence the course of the adjudication process.

The Sharmila case – by this I mean not just the fact of Sharmila putting up such an epic and heroic resistance against a draconian law, the Armed Forces Special Powers Act, AFSPA, but also the manner her protest is being received by supporters and detractors alike, is verging on the edge of absurdity – the kind of absurdity of the Catch-22 situation. If those of us who have read the 1961 Joseph Heller novel by the name still remember, this is a situation in which a problem is inherent in the very answer to the problem, therefore both the problem as well as the answer remain logical but frustratingly unresolved. In the novel set in the backdrop of the World War II, any American fighter pilots who thinks he has had enough of combat flying and wanted to be grounded could do so only if he applied formally that he has become insane. But if he did manage to fill up such a form and apply, it only proved he was not insane so could not leave his combat duties.

In explaining the Catch-22 paradox, the popular internet encyclopaedia, Wikipedia, has some very interesting and illustrative examples. One of them says it is like looking for your car key after locking it up inside the car, and another likens it to looking for the light switches in a room where the lights have been switched off. I like the second example, not for anything else than that it provides some room for hope. In groping blindly in the dark room, there is still an outside hope that you may stumble upon the switches and switch the lights on, unlike in the case of the car key locked up inside the car where the only way to get the key would in all probability be by breaking something.

It is very sad but nonetheless true that Sharmila’s case is becoming akin to this situation. In all the clamour for her freedom is also embedded such a paradox, for the same people who cry for her freedom also quite obviously want her to continue her heroic hunger strike and not end it in resignation. No marks for guessing, without spelling it out, and without actually meaning it, this freedom would in all certainty mean her death as well. It would be extremely selfish if anybody were to want this kind of martyrdom. As it is, without the need for dying, she is already uniquely a martyr beyond compare. Against the fearsome certainty of such a knowledge, all the sound and fury screamed out by many against the State home minister Gaikhangam’s statement that Sharmila was re-arrested so that she is not allowed to die, seem empty. No dispute that the AFSPA must ultimately go, but the million dollar question is, while this draconian Act stubbornly remains, shouldn’t Sharmila live?

Indications are, the AFSPA is not just about to go. The recent rebuff by the new NDA government, of Justice Santosh Hegde’s report on the extra judicial killings in Manipur, is enough testimony. In its statement the Union government claimed there has not been any extra judicial killing by the security forces, and if there ever were to be any, this would not be tolerated at all. An apparatus of the Union judiciary clearly said extra judicial killings have been rampant in Manipur, and the Union executive simply denied this without substantiating, as if by an absolute official fiat. Earlier, another probe by a committee headed by Justice Jeevan Reddy which recommended in effect that the AFSPA be incorporated into the civil legislation, Unlawful Activities Prevention Act, UAPA, so as to make actions under it accountable to the civil justice system, was simply shelved by the then UPA government without an official word. In the current heightened tension on the India and Pakistan border as well as the unfolding cold war between India and China in the Northeast India sector of the border known at the McMahon Line, it is unlikely the Union government would do anything that is deemed possible of hurting the Indian Army’s morale. We also know every well by now that the erstwhile UPA government headed by Manmohan Singh did earnestly want at one stage to “humanise” AFSPA (in the former PM’s own words), which is why the Jeevan Reddy committee was instituted in the first place, but the committee’s recommendations were not even tabled in Parliament because the Army objected to it.

This is the nature of the problem. Let us be honest. We know even the State government is quite powerless in resolving the problem. In Manipur, it is probably true that many in the government want the continuance of the AFSPA, but in neighbouring Nagaland, where Assembly resolutions have been passed for the lifting of the Act from the State, and where the militant groups there are in a peace parley with the Union government, the AFSPA nonetheless continues. Lest I am misread, let me be apologetic and reassert that my question here is not at all about supporting the continuance of AFSPA. It is about not allowing the icon of the resistance against it, Irom Sharmila, to die, at least not for anybody’s need to have a martyr out of the issue.

At this moment though, it is difficult to imagine a situation in which she is free and alive. Even if she remains in prison, it is difficult to see her coming through this ordeal alive. Here I am reminded of a lecture in Calcutta by a well known intellectual, Ranabir Sammadar, of the Calcutta Research Group, where he argued why the idea of ultimate resistance and redemption is so closely parented with the idea of death. Even by the example of history, this is seems to be the case. Jesus Christ’s resistance is just the most prominent example. By a strange coincidence, perhaps with the presence of a Manipuri (me) as the cue, in a discussion over tea after his lecture, Sammadar reminded me of Sharmila’s resistance and the way it is headed, in an effort to make his rather intellectually dense lecture more immediately intelligible.

Sammadar makes sense only if we agree that ultimate resistance is about a willingness to die for a cause. Sharmila obviously is committed to this level in her fight against the AFSPA. And the beauty about her struggle is, she is not even bitter against anybody, not even those who have made the continued promulgation of the Act possible. All she wants is the Act repealed without even bothering to blame anybody for its continuance. It is a fight against a dark idea and not anybody. Which resistance can be as pure?

What must supporting Sharmila amount to then? Should it also be an equal willingness to die for the cause Sharmila so believes in? The more relevant question is, to my mind, not so much about matching Sharmila in the commitment to have the AFSPA repealed for I don’t think there are not many, if any, who can boast of such calibre, but about what must be the appropriate response to Sharmila’s resistance, of those who are against the idea of the AFSPA but fall short of Sharmila’s commitment against it? This humility to acknowledge that their own resistance is not ultimate, and that there is no way they would be willing to give up everything for the cause, unfortunately is missing. In the end then, though there are many who spit fire and brimstone in the resistance against AFSPA, only few would be pushed to where Sammadar anticipated in the lecture. There is therefore a degree of selfishness in those who imagine Sharmila as a martyr than a living legend and leader. I for one want her to continue in her struggle but do so alive. The AFSPA must go, but while it lasts, do everything else under the sun to ensure Sharmila lives.

A parable from the Bible which those of us who studied in mission schools (or else are Christians) would probably be familiar with comes to mind. It tells of an episode from King Solomon’s life. The wise king was once called upon to deliver a judgment in a child custody dispute between two women who claimed to be the mother of an infant. When nothing else worked to resolve the dispute, the king finally gave a mock verdict that he has decided that the infant be cut in half so either of the two women can keep a half each. One woman agreed the other did not, saying her rival may be given custody of the infant than to cut it up. King Solomon’s real verdict followed. He concluded that the woman who was willing to lose custody of the infant so that it may live was the real mother. Here is a great lesson for all of us following and supporting the Sharmila issue. Taking cue from the parable, I would without hesitation say the real supporters of Sharmila are those who would fight with her without pushing her to her death and martyrdom.

31-Aug-2014 / IFP Articles / 4 Comments

Comments


Dr. A. Bimol Akoijam

2-Sep-2014 | 02:19 PM

I couldn’t have agreed more. I hope, people do read this piece. However, there are basic issues that we also need to address, such as lack of understanding on AFSPA and related issues. Such lack has serious implication for the movement against the AFSPA. To take some examples, despite so many years of struggle and AFSPA being in the public domain, there is this certainly avoidable lack of understanding of the issues at hand amongst the people, including those in the forefront of the movement. Strange as it might seem, besides having written in media, I have shared with many of them and some of them had even spent money to invite me to speak on the issues on couple of occasions. To take one example is that there is no relation between Disturbed Area Acts (DAA) and AFSPA, and removing Disturbed Area tag under DAA does not necessarily mean that AFSPA will go. But we do hear some of our political leaders and activists saying that removing disturbed area under DAA, will lead to removing AFSPA. And despite Supreme Court has asked for the review after every six month (as per its judgment of 1997), newspapers in Manipur keep on reporting that the State Cabinet has extended the ‘disturbed area’ for another year (thereby, reading it as extension of AFSPA), and hardly, if at all there is, voice against this speaks of the ignorance. And there is this curious case of army or union armed forces such as Assam Riffles conducting operations along with Manipur police in areas from where AFSPA has been lifted; and people get to see such members of union armed forces conducting ROP in Imphal. Under what legal provision under which such activities have been allowed? I am afraid, failing to notice this is part of the same truncated understanding on the issue. Indeed, if this is the case, what’s the point in asking for removing AFSPA? And MLAs and Ministers in the state have repeatedly said, sometimes while sharing the same platform in seminars or public functions with activists, that they would remove AFSPA only when the ‘law and order’ improves. Why is that our activists rarely questioned them as to what is this ‘law and order’ problem’ these ‘leaders’ are talking about? Or similarly, have the leaders of movement against AFSPA ever questioned the pronouncement of the Supreme Court that the ‘disturbed condition’ wherein the AFSPA has been enforced is not due to armed rebellion’? It should go without saying that the failure to raise such issues has a direct relation to the level of public consciousness, and hence the strength of the movement. And hence, I suppose, saving Sharmila would also entail an honest introspection on some of these issues as well.

Narender Kumar

20-Sep-2014 | 02:09 PM

Great piece of analysis of the situation Pradip. There is no doubt that in our culture, putting one's life at stake is considered to be the biggest act of sacrifice and most forceful instrument of resistance. But it is also true that not many would have the same level of willingness to sacrifice, plus it is also a matter of choice in using methods. However, this generality should not deter us in participating in and strengthening the resistance against AFSPA. Surely there is a greater level of awareness among people at large about the need to repeal AFSPA, and the struggle must go on, in whatever form it is possible

Michael

6-Oct-2014 | 10:50 AM

Really a good piece!!! what ever be the form of struggle the ultimate goal is to repeal AFSPA. Except the struggle of Irom, is there any organisation or group whic deserves appreciation? Whom to blame for catch 22 situation of Irom. Can we call her as a leader ? Does she have a clear cut strategy of the struggle? IS she simply a pawn ? why the people of manipur in general are not supporting? These are also some of the million dollar questions. I really appreciate your appeal and guts to write such a piece!!!

C Balagopal

21-Nov-2014 | 11:17 AM

Irom Sharmila's single minded struggle against the AFSPA will ultimately prevail. I am convinced that the democratic processes and judicial institutions in this country will ensure that happens. In fact, it would be more correct to say, unless this draconian measure is removed, we cannot claim to be a true democracy. Irom Sharmila is an icon for all protest movements everywhere in this country.



Random Items 

11 candidates in Chandel and Tengnoupal

IMPHAL | Feb 20 Eleven candidates are in poll fray in 41-Chandel and 42-Tengnoupal ACs with the withdrawal of candidature by an independent candidate namely KB Kothang in Tengnoupal AC on the last day of withdrawal of candidature today. Earlier, seven c.....

21-Feb-2017 | Our Staff Reporter | 0 Comments

No Kangla meeting for BJP

IMPHAL | Feb 20 The proposed political convention of the BJP inside the premises of Kangla, which is to be addressed by the Prime Minister Narendra Modi this month, has been relocated to a different venue following complaint by PRJA to the election commi.....

21-Feb-2017 | Press Release | 0 Comments

4 withdraws nomination 

IMPHAL | Feb 20 Four candidates have withdrawn their candidatures on the last date of withdrawal for the first phase of the ensuing 11th state assembly election, to be held on March 8. The candidates are one each from Lilong, Wangjing Tentha, Jiribam a.....

21-Feb-2017 | Press Release | 0 Comments

“Dirty politics can only be removed by politics”

IMPHAL | Feb 20 North East India Development Party (NEIDP) president Narengbam Samarjit appealed to the people of Patsoi to take a good chance of their voting powers in order to maintain the territorial integrity of the state. While attending a flag hoi.....

21-Feb-2017 | Our Staff Reporter | 0 Comments

Framework agreement would not affect state: Biren

IMPHAL | Feb 20 Former MLA Nongthombam Biren assured that the framework agreement would not adversely affect the state. Addressing at a flag hoisting ceremony for Bharitya Janata Party (BJP) candidate Yumkham Erabot Singh of Wangkhei assembly constituen.....

21-Feb-2017 | Our Staff Reporter | 0 Comments

Posthumous honour for Kanhailal

IMPHAL | Feb 20 Theatre legend of Manipur, Hesinam Kanhailal, who is also the founder and director of Kalakshetra Manipur, was posthumously honored with the prestigious Ammannur puraskaram instituted by Kerala Sangeetha Nataka Academi, department of cult.....

21-Feb-2017 | Our Staff Reporter | 0 Comments

Rajnath’s promise not enough: AMSU

IMPHAL | Feb 20 The All Manipur Students Union reiterating its demand for detail of the ‘Framework Agreement’ signed between the government of India and the NSCN (IM) said no power in the world can underestimate Manipur. A release said without the cons.....

21-Feb-2017 | Press Release | 0 Comments

Congress pledges to safeguard territory

IMPHAL | Feb 20 Manipur PCC released today its election manifesto for the ensuing state assembly elections promising a constitutional safeguard for the territorial integrity of Manipur. The manifesto was released by CP Joshi, general secretary, AICC and .....

21-Feb-2017 | Our Staff Reporter | 0 Comments

Two days seminar at MU

IMPHAL | Feb 20 Two days seminar on North East India since 1947 under society, polity and economy with reference to the state of Manipur began today at Committee Room, Vice Chancellor’s Office, Manipur University, Canchipur, Imphal. The seminar was orga.....

21-Feb-2017 | Our Staff Reporter | 0 Comments

International eye care day on March 3

IMPHAL | Feb 20 Since the first International Conference on prevention and Rehabilitation of hearing impairment was held in Beijing, China on March 3rd 2007, the day is observed as ‘International Ear-care Day’ every year across the world. The day is obs.....

21-Feb-2017 | Our Staff Reporter | 0 Comments

‘Jiribam peaceful under Debendra’

Jiri News Network JIRIBAM | Feb 20 Ahead of the 11th Manipur legislative assembly election, a flag hosting ceremony along with public meeting was held today at the residence of Thoudam Debendra Singh who is the candidate of Indian National Congress (IN.....

21-Feb-2017 | Agency | 0 Comments

Top post for Hangkhanlian: Chaoba

CCDPUR | Feb 20 Top BJP leader Th Chaoba today campaigned hard for party candidate V Hangkhanlian of Churachandpur constituency giving a hint that he would be given a top post in the next government. Th Chaoba was speaking at the flag hoisting function o.....

21-Feb-2017 | Correspondent | 0 Comments

Latest Comments